BitVM in a Nutshell
  • BitVM in a Nutshell
  • Introduction to BitVM
    • What Is BitVM?
    • How Bitcoin's Programming Works
    • How BitVM Enhances Bitcoin's Functionality
    • Bringing Computation to Bitcoin Through Off-Chain Execution
    • Conclusion
  • BitVM Applications & Use Cases
    • Introduction
    • Building Trust-Minimized Bridges
    • Beyond the Lightning Network
    • Sharing Bitcoin Security with Other Systems
    • Conclusion
  • BitVM Programming Paradigms
    • Introduction
    • How to Construct a BitVM in Practice
    • The Challenges of Compiling for Bitcoin
    • The Solution: Staging Compilation and Decomposition
    • Remarks and Future Directions
  • Existing Efforts related to BitVM
    • The Birth of BitVM
    • Making BitVM Practical: The Push for Efficiency and Automation
    • Real-World Applications: The BitVM Bridge
    • Conclusion
  • Future Work: Scaling BitVM in Production
    • Introduction
    • Developing Bitcoin-Friendly Cryptographic Primitives
    • Automating the Compilation Pipeline
    • Enhancing Security Through Formal Methods
    • Conclusion
  • BitVM vs. OP_CAT
    • What Is OP_CAT and Why Does It Matter?
    • How OP_CAT Could Boost BitVM
    • Why Isn’t OP_CAT Enabled Yet?
    • Conclusion
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  1. BitVM Applications & Use Cases

Sharing Bitcoin Security with Other Systems

In blockchain security, two primary models dominate: Proof-of-Work (PoW) and Proof-of-Stake (PoS). Bitcoin's PoW model stands out for its exceptional security, powered by an immense amount of computational energy distributed across a global network of miners. This robust economic security has made Bitcoin a benchmark in the industry, sparking interest from other blockchain systems seeking ways to leverage or integrate with its unparalleled resilience.

One innovative approach to leveraging Bitcoin's security is Stakechain, a Proof-of-Stake (PoS) model anchored to Bitcoin’s economic robustness. In Stakechain, participants lock Bitcoin as collateral to secure the PoS chain, with the risk of losing their stake if they engage in malicious activities. To enforce accountability, Stakechain employs one-time signatures, which penalize attackers by enabling slashing (i.e., confiscating staked Bitcoin) if private keys are reused. This mechanism effectively prevents double-signing attacks specific to the PoS system. However, while this approach mitigates certain risks, it falls short of addressing other forms of misbehavior within the ecosystem, leaving room for further security enhancements.

BitVM has the potential to expand slashing conditions beyond simple double-signing by enabling complex, verifiable computations. With BitVM, "programmable slashing" becomes possible, allowing Stakechain to implement more sophisticated rules to penalize a wider range of malicious behaviors. This capability enables the enforcement of detailed and customizable staker behavior policies, enhancing the security and flexibility of the system. By leveraging BitVM, Stakechain could evolve into a powerful tool that extends Bitcoin’s security to other systems requiring decentralized validation models, such as data availability layers, unlocking new possibilities for secure and scalable blockchain applications.

PreviousBeyond the Lightning NetworkNextConclusion

Last updated 6 months ago